Read the original article here.

---

Bada: Samsung's Attempt to Challenge Mobile Giants and Why It Failed

In the rapidly evolving landscape of early 21st-century mobile technology, dominated by Apple's iOS and Google's Android, major players sought to carve out their own niches. Samsung Electronics, already a significant hardware manufacturer, decided to develop its own mobile operating system, Bada. Meaning "ocean" or "sea" in Korean, Bada was envisioned as a powerful platform capable of competing in the mid- to high-end smartphone market. However, despite initial promise and Samsung's immense resources, Bada ultimately failed to gain significant traction, becoming a notable example of a promising tech project that couldn't withstand the competitive tide.

This resource explores the rise and fall of Bada, examining its origins, features, market performance, and the critical factors that led to its demise, framing it as a case study within the history of notable technology failures.

1. Conception and Background

Samsung's decision to develop Bada stemmed from a desire to control its own software destiny in a market increasingly defined by operating systems. While Samsung was already a major manufacturer of Android devices (under the popular Galaxy brand), relying solely on Google's platform presented strategic risks. Creating an in-house OS offered potential advantages: greater control over hardware integration, optimization, user experience, and potentially a larger share of app store revenue.

Bada was conceived not just as an operating system but as a platform designed for various devices, although it primarily manifested on smartphones under the Wave brand. The underlying technology aimed for flexibility, initially planned to separate middleware from the core kernel, allowing adaptation to different kernel types.

Middleware: Software that acts as a bridge between an operating system or database and applications, enabling them to interact. It facilitates communication and data management in distributed systems.

2. Development and Initial Launch

Samsung officially announced Bada in late 2009, signaling its intent to enter the OS race. The first Bada-powered smartphone, the Samsung Wave S8500, was unveiled at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona in February 2010 and subsequently released in May 2010.

The launch was accompanied by a significant push to attract developers. Samsung hosted "Developer Days" events globally and announced a substantial "Bada Developer Challenge" prize pool ($2.7 million USD) to incentivize application creation. A beta version of the Bada Software Development Kit (SDK) was released to the public in May 2010, followed by version 1.0 in August 2010.

Software Development Kit (SDK): A set of software development tools that allows the creation of applications for a certain software package, framework, hardware platform, computer system, video game console, operating system, or similar platform. It typically includes libraries, documentation, sample code, processes, and guides.

Initial sales of the Wave S8500 were promising, with one million units sold within the first four weeks. Samsung also highlighted development partnerships with major companies like Twitter, EA, Capcom, Gameloft, and Blockbuster, suggesting early industry support.

3. Core Features and Architecture

Bada was built with a layered architecture designed for both flexibility and performance:

1. Kernel: The lowest layer, responsible for managing hardware resources. Bada was designed to be flexible, using either a proprietary real-time operating system (RTOS) kernel or the Linux kernel depending on the device configuration. Early versions reportedly incorporated code from BSD-based operating systems like FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD.

   Real-Time Operating System (RTOS): An operating system intended for applications with strict time constraints, often used in embedded systems and devices where operations must complete within specific deadlines.

2. Device Layer: Provided core system functions necessary for device operation, including graphics rendering, network protocols (like Wi-Fi and cellular data), telephony features, and security management.

3. Service Layer: Offered higher-level services accessible to applications. This included features like SMS (text messaging), mapping services, and in-app purchasing functionality, often interacting with a dedicated "Bada Server."

4. Framework Layer: The uppermost layer, providing the Application Programming Interface (API) that developers used to build applications. This API was primarily in C++.

   Application Programming Interface (API): A set of definitions and protocols that allows different software applications to communicate with each other. It specifies how software components should interact.

For developers, Bada offered:

• UI Controls: Various pre-built elements for creating user interfaces.

• Web Browser: Based on the open-source WebKit engine (also used by Safari and Chrome), offering standard web browsing capabilities with features like pinch-to-zoom, tabbed browsing, and cut/copy/paste.

• Multimedia Support: Inclusion of Adobe Flash (versions 9-11, specifically Flash Lite 4 with ActionScript 3.0 support in Bada 2.0) allowing rich web content and games. OpenGL ES 2.0 provided 3D graphics capabilities.

• Mapping: Interactive mapping features with Points of Interest (POI) support.

• Sensor Integration: Support for various device sensors including motion sensing, vibration control, face detection, accelerometer, magnetometer, tilt, GPS, and multi-touch input.

• Development Environment: An Eclipse-based Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with C++ support, GNU toolchains for building and debugging, a drag-and-drop UI designer, and an emulator for testing applications.

  Integrated Development Environment (IDE): A software application that provides comprehensive facilities to computer programmers for software development. An IDE normally consists of a source code editor, build automation tools, and a debugger. OpenGL ES: A widely used cross-platform API for rendering 2D and 3D graphics on embedded systems and mobile devices.

4. The Samsung Apps Ecosystem

Crucial to any mobile platform is its application store. Alongside the first Wave phone, Samsung launched Samsung Apps, an international application store. While it also served Samsung's Android devices and feature phones, it was the primary distribution channel for Bada applications. At its peak, it reportedly housed over 2,400 applications for the Bada platform.

However, compared to the hundreds of thousands, and later millions, of apps available on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store at the time, 2,400 was a relatively small number. The limited size and perceived quality of the Bada app ecosystem would prove to be a major challenge.

5. Evolution: Bada 1.x vs. Bada 2.0

Bada launched with version 1.0 on the Wave S8500. Minor updates followed, like 1.0.2 for European users and 1.2, which debuted on the Samsung Wave II S8530.

The most significant update was Bada 2.0, first shown in alpha form in early 2011 and officially released towards the end of 2011, launching with the final flagship device, the Samsung Wave III S8600. Bada 2.0 aimed to address many of the criticisms leveled against the earlier versions by introducing crucial modern smartphone features:

• Full HTML5 and WAC 2.0 compatibility.
• True Multitasking: Bada 1.x only allowed one third-party app to run at a time, severely limiting usability. Bada 2.0 removed this restriction.
• WiFi-Direct support.
• Updated Dolfin Browser 3.0 with a download manager.
• User interface enhancements like Smart-wallpapers and a new GUI.
• Accessibility features like Text-to-speech and Voice recognition (using Vlingo technology).
• Push notifications.
• Near-Field Communication (NFC) support.
• Improved security policies.
• Inclusion of Samsung's own services like ChatON (instant messaging), Caster (multimedia sharing), and Music Hub (a music store).

Bada 2.0 was a substantial improvement and brought the platform closer to parity with competitors in terms of core functionality.

6. Market Performance

Despite Samsung's manufacturing scale, Bada struggled to gain significant global market share against the dominant forces. Canalys reported shipments of 3.5 million Bada phones in Q1 2011, rising to 4.5 million in Q2 2011. Gartner reported Bada holding 2.7% of the smartphone market share in Q1 2012, up from 1.9% a year prior, indicating some growth but still a very small fraction compared to Android and iOS, which collectively commanded the vast majority of the market.

While Bada phones, particularly the Wave series, sold reasonably well in specific markets (like South Korea and parts of Europe), they never achieved the global ubiquity necessary to establish Bada as a major mobile ecosystem.

7. Criticisms and Contributing Factors to Failure

Several critical issues plagued Bada, particularly in its crucial early versions (1.x), which significantly hindered adoption and developer interest:

• Initial Restrictions: Bada 1.x initially banned Voice over IP (VoIP) applications over Wi-Fi, preventing popular services like Skype. Although this restriction was later removed, it created an early negative impression.
• Limited API Access: The external sensor API wasn't designed to be easily expandable, potentially limiting the integration of future sensor technologies. More significantly, Bada 1.x had strict limitations on application access to user data like SMS/MMS inboxes due to "performance and privacy issues." While lifted in 2.0, this hindered development of apps reliant on messaging features.
• Lack of True Multitasking (1.x): Only allowing one third-party app to run at a time was a major functional limitation compared to competing OSes, impacting user experience significantly until version 2.0 arrived.
• Subpar Performance (1.x): Early versions reportedly suffered from poor GPS performance and general performance issues.
• The "App Gap": Arguably the most critical factor in Bada's failure was the persistent lack of popular applications. Developers prioritize platforms with large user bases, and users prioritize platforms with the apps they want. Bada was caught in a vicious cycle: not enough users to attract developers, and not enough popular apps to attract users. Despite Samsung's efforts and the improvements in Bada 2.0, the platform never amassed the breadth or depth of applications available on Android or iOS. This lack of a vibrant ecosystem made Bada phones less appealing to consumers.

8. The End Game: Decline and Merger with Tizen

Facing intense competition and the persistent challenges of building an ecosystem from scratch, Samsung began to pivot. In June 2012, Samsung announced its intention to merge Bada into the Tizen project. Tizen was a separate Linux-based mobile operating system initiative involving multiple companies, including Intel and Samsung. The idea was to combine the efforts and technologies from Bada and other projects (like Samsung's earlier Linux-based LiMo platform) into a single, stronger, open-source OS contender.

Although Bada 2.0 devices continued to be sold and supported for a time, active development on Bada itself ceased. On February 25, 2013, Samsung formally announced the halt of Bada development, fully shifting its focus to Tizen. Bug reporting for Bada was terminated in April 2014, effectively marking the end of official support for the platform.

9. Legacy and Lessons Learned

Bada's journey from a promising initiative to a discontinued project offers valuable lessons in the high-stakes world of technology platforms.

• Ecosystem is King: Bada demonstrated that hardware quality and OS features, while important, are often secondary to the availability of a rich and popular application ecosystem. Without developer support and a thriving app store, even a technically capable OS will struggle.
• Timing and Competition: Bada entered a market already solidifying around two dominant players. Establishing a third major mobile OS from scratch proved incredibly difficult, requiring massive, sustained investment and overcoming inertia from both consumers and developers.
• The Challenge of Control: While Samsung desired control over its software, the effort required to build and maintain a proprietary OS and its ecosystem was enormous and ultimately outweighed the benefits compared to leveraging Android's established success.
• Pivot to Collaboration: The eventual shift to Tizen, a multi-company open-source effort, suggested Samsung recognized the difficulty of going it alone and saw potential in a more collaborative approach, though Tizen also faced significant challenges in the smartphone market.

In the context of tech failures, Bada stands out as a case where a major company with significant resources attempted to create a first-party platform but failed to build the crucial surrounding ecosystem required for success in the modern mobile era. It highlights the winner-take-most nature of platform markets and the immense hurdles faced by late entrants. Bada wasn't necessarily a bad operating system, particularly in its later versions, but its failure to attract users and developers in sufficient numbers sealed its fate, relegating it to the history books as a notable, albeit infamous, attempt to challenge the mobile duopoly.